WAter, Sanitation, Hygiene (WASH)

The WASH Alliance The Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) sector requires greater synergy. Six Dutch civil society organisations with extensive experience in WASH have joined forces to form the WASH Alliance: Simavi, Akvo, AMREF, ICCO, RAIN and WASTE. Behind them is a much broader group of Southern and Northern Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) that cooperate within the Alliance. This unprecedented coordination offers unique added value.

Sanitation situation

Safe water and hygienic living conditions are essential for human health and livelihoods, but the world is facing a water crisis: fresh water is our most degraded natural resource, with rapidly increasing scarcity and declining quality due to population growth, economic development, unsustainable land use, pollution and climate change. Access to safe water is very unequal, and poor people live in increasingly unhealthy environments causing ill health, economic loss and political tensions. Despite considerable progress in some countries, 884 million people still lack access to safe drinking water, while 2.6 billion have no access to adequate sanitation. Countries in Sub-Saharan Africa are particularly off-track. The main causes are lack of good governance, both public and private, and of an effective political voice for the poor: water and sanitation are not political priorities, citizens’ rights are violated, investments are badly targeted and technology choices are often inappropriate. Lack of local ownership leads to bad maintenance and dysfunctional infrastructures. The private sector has potential, but is not yet geared to successfully service the potentially large market for water and sanitation. Organizations often work in parallel, instead of combining efforts and expertise. Promising, though, are the increasing recognition of the Right to Water and Sanitation and of the importance of MDG7, and the initiative to harmonize donor and country efforts in the Sanitation and Water for All initiative. The Dutch government has shown significant leadership in spearheading these efforts.

Main objectives of assessment

The main objective of the WASH Alliance’s five year programme (2011-2015) is to reach: reduced poverty and improved health, environmental and economic conditions by empowering people and creating an enabling environment, thus achieving increased sustainable access to and use of safe water and sanitation services and improved hygiene practices for women and marginalised groups. To implement its coordinated water, sanitation and hygiene programme, the members of the WASH Alliance work with their Southern partners in 8 countries in a multi-stakeholder approach. They involve civil society and the private and public sectors: building civil society from the community level up to the local, national and international level, strengthening CSOs and key stakeholders as well as the networks that link them. The ultimate purpose is to ensure that all relevant stakeholders have the capacity to perform well in their own roles, to improve access to water, sanitation and hygiene. Four supporting objectives have been formulated:

(1) Empowered communities, specifically women and girls, will demand and achieve sustainable access to and use of safe water, improved sanitation and hygienic living condition; This objectives contributes directly to MDG7. The Alliance will apply intervention strategies that focus on sustainable economic development and direct poverty alleviation (DEODAB) and civil society strengthening (MO) at community level. Typical activities by Southern CSOs include: community organising in Community Based Organisations (CBOs), such as water committees; training and awareness raising; participatory planning; hygiene promotion; social marketing of sanitation; construction and rehabilitation of water infrastructure; promotion of eco-sanitation and productive re-use of water and waste; promotion of appropriate technologies for WASH infrastructure; implementing measures to retain water;

(2) Relevant service providers in the business sector, public sector and civil society will co-operate to respond to the need for sustainable, accessible, affordable and demand-driven WASH services. Intervention strategies will focus on civil society strengthening (MO) at intermediary level (NGOs, multi-stakeholder networks, involvement of private and public sector). Typical activities include: develop and implement capacity building plans for Southern partners; workshops and facilitation to promote multi-stakeholder cooperation; support local planning processes; develop regional knowledge centres; training of CSOs, private sector actors, government staff; strengthen networks for knowledge sharing;

(3) Policy makers and key actors will promote and enable the sustainable realisation of the right to water and sanitation through their policies, programmes and budget allocations, and are held accountable for their achievements in WAS; Intervention strategies will focus on policy influencing (BB) and strengthening the capacity of CSOs at local, national and international level to lobby, advocate and campaign (MO). Typical activities : lobbying and advocacy campaigns at local, national and international level on issues such as: budget allocations to WASH; targeting of resources; coordination in the sector; recognition and realisation of the Right to Water and Sanitation (RTWS); sustainable approaches to WASH; building capacities of CSOs in lobbying and campaigning, and strengthen Southern involvement in lobbying networks;

(4) A stable, complementary, effective and accountable Alliance (in North and South), in which participating actors will feel ownership, share knowledge and co-ordinate work towards sustainable integration of WASH into policies, strategies and programmes, in order to increase the access to and use of WASH facilities; Intervention strategies will focus on civil society strengthening (MO ) and improved coordination and harmonisation in the WASH Sector with strong South - North links. Typical activities : form and facilitate programme country teams, build PME capacities, share knowledge, hold joint planning and review meetings, strengthen Southern involvement in governance.

 

Added value of WASH alliance

The Group forming the WASH Alilance together with their Southern and Northern Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) who cooperate within the Alliance feel that they have an added value

  1. An enormous combined outreach and impact, by bringing to the sector increased learning, better focus and critical mass.
  2. Sustainability through the systematic adherence to five key sustainability principles, called the ‘FIETS’: F inancial, I nstitutional, E nvironmental, T echnological and S ocial sustainability.
  3. A truly integrated programme covering the entire WASH chain from water supply to sanitation and hygiene promotion from community to the international level.
  4. An emphasis on in-country and cross-country linking and learning, by building networks and using innovative web-based ICT tools. To do this, the WASH Alliance works directly with 113 Southern partners.


Project updates

Workshop on sanitation financing in Ghana (Accra, Kasoa, Tamale), November 2011

Mission Summary:

1. There is an appearant contradiction between wishes of national government and local governments. National government focuses on household sanitation (as per UN guidelines, shared facilities do not count), whereas local authorities do generate revenues from its licensing (franchising). In practice it seems to be more of a focus shift to household sanitation.

2. Investment costs of public toilets, Tamale Municipal Authority (TMA) is looking for donor funding for investment and is engaged with several parties. The operation and management could than be given out on a license or franchise. There is some talk of private investment, but there is nothing tangible.

3. Financing sanitation with GWA partners. Based on their expectations to get practical and useful information in consultation with WASH coordinator and national coordinator, it was decided that instead of a presentation an interactive session would be more useful. This started with the facilitator asking questions to the participants.

4. Two presentations were prepared, one on sustainable sanitation outlining FIETS and one on sanitation financing. These have been shared with CLIP. Separately a write up has been prepared of an ad-hoc training session on practical aspects of sanitation financing, micro finance etc.

5. Handouts that have been prepared under PSO/FINISH have been adopted to GWA (Ghana WASH Alliance) in consultation with Nashiru (WASH Coordinator).  Handout on safe sanitation, Handout on toilet options, Handout on leach pits and Handout on triggering behaviour change. The handouts were distributed during both workshops.

6. Debriefing session:

a) Micro finance, the financial institutions present at the workshop would sound their boards and came back with a proposition by January 2012. CLIP was requested to pursue those that not participate on a one-on-one basis, using the synopsis of the feasibility study and the modified presentation for the banks (annex), that has been sent separately. In this there will be a clear division of tasks with CLIP and GWA partners generating awareness and demand, and MFIs can follow it up with finance.

b) SME financing for emptiers logistic this seems to be a ready market, public toilet investment based on cash flow projections (mission, vision, revenue models) another ready market, main risk political, risk mitigation through partnership TMA. Others supply side aggregator and construction quality improvement.

c) As proposition of MFIs nor of banks are really know yet (guarantee requirement, topping up savings as first losses, blending commercial funding), it was recommended to keep the funds earmarked for the revolving fund unallocated for the time being.

d) Sanitation technical development, it was agreed among GWA that superstructures may be low cost (unless the household wants to really spend of course), substructure use is mostly KVIP/alternating pits. As there is issues with water usage alternative lining arrangements can be entered into. UDDT may be an option too, just as leach pits and biogas linked.

e) the technical film was well received. NC would send the local languages needed, and together with CLIP WASTE will prepare write up for KVIP along the liens of the learning guide. The demand generation film was shared with NC and CLIP for information. This film showing always needs to be followed by discussion and preferable in the presence of MFIs as it generates real demand, yet the story has to be localised.

f) WASTE offered assistance to GWA / TMA in developing project proposals (common treatment stems, joint septic tank, joint biogas). This will be routed through CLIP and within WASTE Emeline

g) Meeting with local banks proved useful, they have some products ready for the identified business opportunities, Stanbic has SME financing for public toilets and Asset financing for logistics. It was agreed that CLIP would send summary of the study, a generic outline and specific requirements, this would be looked at by the branch manager, and he would send it with his personal note to headoffice. Agricultural Development Bank is in principle open to all proposals.